Postcard kindly supplied by Alan Chrisman.
Acknowledgements to Cavern City Tours who hold an annual International
Beatles Convention in Liverpool. Phone 0151-236-9091
This is a LIFO system - latest items come at the top
January 31, 2024
The Estate of Stuart Sutcliffe, Artist and
Original Beatles Member, Is Selling Its
Entire Collection The archive includes Sutcliffe's
artworks and early Beatles memorabilia.
By Min Chen for Artnet
For more than
two decades, Diane Vitale has helped steward
the estate of artist and original member of
the Beatles, Stuart Sutcliffe. At its heart
is a collection that numbers hundreds of
objects, comprising artworks, letters,
notes, photographs, memorabilia, and other
ephemera. “It really goes on and on,” she
said of its contents, which document
Sutcliffe’s life and work in vivid detail.
But now, Vitale is ready to let it all go.
TheSutcliffe
estateis currently seeking
a buyer to acquire its entire collection—a
trove that doesn’t just capture an abstract
artist in bloom, but logs the formation of
one of the world’s most beloved bands. It
promises to be a goldmine for art as much as
music historians, if they’ll bite.
“To be very
honest with you, I’d love to give that
responsibility to someone else,” Vitale told
me over the phone, speaking about the
management of a repository that consumes
most of her days.
The collection
was begun and built by Sutcliffe’s younger
sister, Pauline Sutcliffe, over the decades
following his untimely death in the 1960s.
Her main goal, Vitale emphasized, was to
establish her brother as an artist apart
from the Beatles. This, she accomplished
with exhibitions of his work, the 2001 bookThe
Beatles’ Shadow, and Sutcliffe’s inclusion
in Cleveland’s Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
Pauline died
in 2019. Since then, Vitale has been
single-handedly administering the estate as
CEO and fulfilling Pauline’s other wish: to
keep the collection intact. It remains top
of mind as she embarks on its sale.
“I’d like to
keep it together,” she said. “That was
Pauline’s dream from the very beginning.”
Sutcliffe was
born in 1940 in Edinburgh, Scotland, before
his father relocated the family to
Liverpool, the U.K., to seek work ahead of
the war. At 16, he attended the Liverpool
College of Art, excelling in painting and
befriending one John Lennon. The pair became
close companions: as students, they shared
an apartment which they painted yellow and
black on a lark. Their bond was such that
another friend, Paul McCartney, grew
jealous.
“I looked up
to Stu. I depended on him to tell me the
truth,” Lennon once reflected. “Stu would
tell me if something was good and I’d
believe him.”
Early in 1960,
Lennon and McCartney convinced Sutcliffe to
purchase a bass guitar using the proceeds
from a painting he’d sold, and join their
rock ‘n’ roll band. Originally dubbed the
Quarrymen, the group was renamed the Beatals
at Sutcliffe’s suggestion, then Silver
Beatles, then simply, the Beatles. By
August, they had landed in Hamburg, Germany,
for a three-month clubresidency.
There, their 17-year-old guitarist George
Harrison was deported for being underage,
McCartney and drummer Pete Best were
arrested for light arson, and Sutcliffe fell
in love.
Photographer
Astrid Kirchherr was in the audience at one
of the Beatles’s club gigs, where she was
bowled over by their raucous set. “All I
wanted was to be with them and to know
them,” she recalled. And she did: Kirchherr
shot some of the earliest photographs of the
leather-clad band with her Rolleicord
camera. She also began dating Sutcliffe; the
couple was engaged by the end of 1960.
Inspired by
the beatnik Kirchherr, Sutcliffe opted to
rededicate himself to art. He left the
Beatles and Liverpool, moved in with the
Kirchherr family, and began attending
classes at the Hamburg College of Art under
the tutelage of sculptor Eduardo Paolozzi.
But, alas, not for long: in April 1962,
Sutcliffe suffered a brain hemorrhage and
died in Kirchherr’s arms, in an ambulance en
route to a hospital. He was 21.
In the years
following his death, Sutcliffe’s sister has
assiduously amassed an archive in his name.
Today, it encompasses some 400 paintings,
sketches, and drawings, and 200 other
artifacts. Among them, the artworks reveal
Sutcliffe’s burgeoning abstract and
figurative style across life studies and
densely impasto-ed canvases. Other objects
bear out his fastidious record-keeping.
There are his hand-drawn maps of London
galleries, as well as an historic letter in
which the band name “The Quarryman” is
scratched out and filled in with “Beatals”
in Sutcliffe’s hand.
However
valuable such a collection, Vitale told me,
“the weight of managing an estate is heavy.”
Around 1999,
Pauline Sutcliffe, then running a thriving
practice as a psychotherapist, decided to
sell the estate. “I would feel then that I
had done my bit and would be able to free
myself from the Beatles,” she wrote inThe
Beatles’ Shadow. “I have been trapped by
them most of my life—I wanted to say
goodbye.”
She had
planned to auction the collection through
Fleetwood Owen, an entertainment auction
house co-founded by Mick Fleetwood of
Fleetwood Mac fame. The sale never got off
the ground. Still, she found cause for
reevaluation, said Vitale, following the
success of and interest in her book:
“Pauline later reflected that it was a sign
she should work to keep the collection
together and find one home for it.”
Though
initially based in Liverpool, the collection
moved with Pauline when she relocated to New
York around 2003, when Vitale began working
with the estate. It is stored in a
10-by-15-foot room in East Hampton, when not
rolled out for exhibitions. Amongits
many outingswere
retrospectives at the Rock and Roll Hall of
Fame and Museum in Cleveland, Victoria
Gallery & Museum in Liverpool, and Stavanger
Museum in Norway. More recently, in 2019, “Artistic
License: Six Takes on the Guggenheim
Collection”
at the Guggenheim Museum in New York
included two Sutcliffe paintings, handpicked
by Richard Prince.
Sinceannouncingher
intention to sell the collection on January
23, Vitale said she has been inundated by
interest. Auction houses have called, as
have institutions such as the Beatles Story
Museum in Liverpool. She won’t disclose how
much she’s asking for the archive—she’s
keeping her options open. “I’m willing to
speak to anyone who’s serious,” she added.
While the best
scenario would be to keep the collection
together, Vitale sees herself making
“concessions” depending on the proposals she
receives. “It would be nice if it stayed
together,” she said. “But it might be that
the artifacts could go to a museum or
university, then the major art, about 150
pieces that have been widely exhibited,
would go to a collector. That’s probably
realistic.”
Even without
its collection, the Stuart Sutcliffe estate
will continue to bolster the artist’s
legacy. Various projects are in the works,
according to Vitale, not limited to a
digital showcase of Sutcliffe’s work at the
Beatles Story, a theatrical production based
on his life, and a fellowship or scholarship
award in his name. She also discussed the
possibility of updatingThe
Beatles’ Shadowfor a TV
adaptation.
For her part,
Vitale, once freed of managing, housing,
insuring, and maintaining the collection,
hopes to tend to her personal pursuits. One
of them is writing—perhaps even a book on
her experiences overseeing the Sutcliffe
estate and encountering his fans (including,
surprisingly, one of the artist’s life
drawing models). The timing, she said, is
right.
“I am a woman
of faith, so I’m just standing on faith that
the right person is going to come at the
right time,” said Vitale. “I’m at a point in
my life where I’d like to do some of my own
dreams.”
January 30, 2024
Three of the best from The Beatles Live at
Stowe School, April 4, 1963
Thirty-seven years ago tonight, the Grateful
Dead played their first show of 1987 with a hometown
performance atSan
Francisco Civic Auditorium(later renamed the Bill
Graham Civic Auditorium in honor of the rock impresario).
The January 28th, 1987 concert stands out in Grateful Dead history thanks to the
band’s performance covering The
Beatles‘ “Get Back” for the first and only time in their career.
The show that night treated attendees to a mix of fan-favorites from the Dead
songbook, as the band opened with “Shakedown Street” and filled the rest of
their two sets and encore with renditions of “Row Jimmy”, “Bird Song”, “Jack
Straw”, “He’s Gone”, “Eyes of the World”, “Sugar Magnolia”, and “U.S. Blues” to
name a few. Their performance of “Get Back” was arguably the highlight of the
concert, and helped to kickstart the night’s festivities following the 13-minute
“Shakedown Street” opener.
Bob Weir took the vocal duties for the cover, although he
did have to stretch his vocal range to the point of almost cracking during the
verses. It’s strange to think that the Dead only covered the popular Beatles
tune once throughout their 30-year run—or maybe not after listening to the
rendition—because its country-drawn rock sound is sonically in line with their
own California country style from their Workingman’s
Dead era.
Deadheads and Beatles fans can check out the video below to hear the performance
of their 1987 live cover.
Setlist:
The Grateful Dead | San Francisco Civic Auditorium | San Francisco, CA |
1/28/87
Set One: Shakedown Street, Get Back*, Peggy-O, Walkin’ Blues, It Must Have Been
the Roses, It’s All Over Now, Row Jimmy, My Brother Esau, Bird Song, Jack Straw
Set Two: When Push Comes to Shove, Samson and Delilah, Black Muddy River, He’s
Gone, Spoonful, Drums, Eyes of the World, Black Peter, Around and Around, Sugar
Magnolia
Encore: U.S. Blues
*Beatles cover, only time played by Grateful Dead
Door into Beatle George Harrison's
childhood home goes on display
Beatles fans will be offered a glimpse into
George Harrison's childhood via the back
door of his former home.
The door, previously on the guitarist's
family home in Liverpool, is the latest item
from the Fab Four's past to go on show at
the Liverpool Beatles Museum.
Harrison moved to the home from the age
of six, in 1950, and the family stayed there
until 1962.
Museum owner Roag Best said Harrison was
still living there at the beginning of
Beatlemania.
The terraced home on Upton Green, Speke,
is now an Airbnb and is owned by Ken
Lambert, who got in touch with the museum.
"When he bought the house the previous
owners asked him if he was interested in the
original back door," said Mr Best, who is
the brother of early Beatles drummer Pete
Best.
"It was just propped up in an
outbuilding, a little bit worse for wear.
"He and a friend spent a considerable
amount of time renovating the door and once
it was renovated he wasn't going to put it
back on the house because it's 73 years old,
if not older.
"He asked if we'd like to put it on
display."
Visitors to the museum will now be able
to open the door to see photos of Harrison
as he was growing up on display behind it.
Mr Best said the exhibit looked like "a
normal back door" but was likely to have
been stepped through by John Lennon and Sir
Paul McCartney as well as Harrison.
He added: "I think fans are going to get
a kick out of the fact they can open the
door and see a collage of photos behind
which will take them back in time to when
George lived in the house."
January 29, 2024
The Song That Made America Fall In Love With
The Beatles By Andrew of Parlogram Auctions
The Beatles Live at Stowe School, April 4,
1963
January 28, 2024 Paul McCartney says Johnny Cash
inspired him to form Wings: “It was a real
act of faith” Wings are preparing to release the
50th anniversary reissue of 'Band On The
Run' on February 2
By Alex Rigotti for NME
Paul McCartney has credited Johnny
Cash for inspiring him to form Wings.
McCartney told MOJO in
a new interview that he turned to Cash for
inspiration when he found himself at a
crossroads once The Beatles were
done.
“After the end of The Beatles I was faced
with certain alternatives,” he says. “One
was to give up music entirely and do God
knows what. Another was to start a
super-band with very famous people, Eric
Clapton and so on. I didn’t like either so I
thought: How did The Beatles start?”
“It was a bunch of mates who didn’t know
what they were doing,” he continued. “That’s
when I realised maybe there is a third
alternative: to get a band that isn’t
massively famous, to not worry if we don’t
know what we’re doing because we would form
our character by learning along the way. It
was a real act of faith. It was crazy,
actually."
McCartney then said he watched Johnny Cash
one night with his wife, Linda, and found
his idea for a new band.
“We were in bed one night,” he
said, “newly married, when Johnny Cash came
on the telly with a new band he’d formed
with Carl Perkins, a big hero of mine. There
they were, playing with some country
musicians I had never heard of, looking like
they were having fun.”
“I thought: here’s Johnny, he’s back, he’s
doing it. So I turned to Linda and said: Do
you want to form a band? And she went:
‘Sure.’ That’s how our relationship was. Do
you want to go and live on a farm in
Scotland? ‘Why not?’”
Wings are set to releasethe
50th anniversary reissue of their seminal
album, ‘Band On The Run’, including some new
‘underdub’ mixes on February 2. “This is
‘Band on the Run’ in a way you’ve never
heard before,” said McCartney of the new
mixes.
“When you are making a song and
putting on additional parts, like an extra
guitar, that’s an overdub. Well, this
version of the album is the opposite,
underdubbed.”
In other news,Paul McCartney
paid tribute to Wings band member Denny
Laine, whopassed away aged
aged 79last December.
January 27, 2024
"What was really exciting for me was
watching Paul's total respect for his band
members": Giles Martin tells the inside
story of the final Beatles song, Now And
Then
By Ken Sharp for Louder's Classic Rock
You probably didn’t have a new (and
final) song from The Beatles on your 2023
bingo card, but that’s what we got,
surprising everybody
Get back indeed. On November 3, 2023,
more than 25 years after the release of two
newBeatles
songsfor the group’s
multi-partAnthologydocumentary
series (Free As A BirdandReal
Love, which featured surviving membersPaul
McCartney,George
Harrisonand Ringo Starr
lending accompaniment to a sparseJohn
Lennon70s-era demo), came
what is being described as the last Beatles
song ever:Now And Then.
During theJeff
Lynne-led reunion sessions in 1994,
Paul, George and Ringo spent a little time
laying down some ideas over John’sNow
And Thendemo before work
ceased. Decades later, using film director
Peter Jackson’s de-mixing technology, which
allowed clear separation of John’s vocals on
his rudimentary demo,Now And
Then, produced by Paul McCartney and Giles
Martin with additional production by Jeff
Lynne, is given the grandiose ‘Fab Four’
treatment.
Using George’s acoustic and electric
guitar from the aborted mid-90s session,
alongside newly recorded contributions from
Paul and Ringo, and a sparkling string
arrangement by Paul, Giles Martin and Ben
Foster, The Beatles returned one last time.
Martin tells us the story of how this last
ever Beatles track came to be.
Giles Martin:
Well, this was a track that was worked on
during theFree
As A Bird sessions
that I wasn’t aware of. The song was in
Paul’s vaults because Paul, George and Ringo
worked in Paul’s studios when they recorded
it way back then. And through the birth of
the technology that we worked on duringGet
Back [The
Beatles’ 2021 documentary series] and the
de-mix technology, Paul originally went to
[director] Peter Jackson to get him to work
on stuff for his concerts so John [Lennon]
would be singing with him onI’ve
Got A Feeling during
his concert.
And I think
from there, Paul asked Peter whether he
would look atNow
And Then,
and he [Paul] started working on it in his
studio and came up with the arrangement and
came up with things like the guitar solo.
What shape was the track in when you
received it? How much had George Harrison
recorded on those sessions?
Well, George had laid down acoustic
and electric guitar, both rhythm guitar
tracks. The guitar solo section in the track
was written and done by Paul before he came
to see me. It was done as kind of a tribute
to George. It’s Paul being George, if you
like [laughs], and he was thinking: “Okay,
what would George have done here?” And
actually, that ran through the whole
sessions, where it was pretty obvious that
Paul was really missing his friends and
trying to respect them and do what they want
him to do.
Was it you or Paul who asked Ringo to play
drums?
I said to Paul: “We should get Ringo
to re-record the drums,” and he agreed. I
think he’d already spoken to Ringo, or Ringo
was aware he was doing the track. I phoned
up Ringo on a Tuesday night or something,
and Ringo says: “I know why you’re phoning
me. You want me to play drums on a Beatles
song.” And I said yeah. So Paul must have
already phoned him.
I had the multitracks to send him. He went:
“Fine, I’ll listen to it and I’ll play on it
and send it back to you.” It’s as simple as
that. He said: “I’ll play it twice, I’ll
listen to it, and I’ll just play along with
the song.” He doesn’t play with a click
track, he just listens to a song and he
plays it.
Was there anything
that Paul had done at the initial sessions
with Jeff Lynne that was kept, or did he
redo everything?
I think we kept his acoustic guitar; he
played acoustic guitar with George, and I
think there’s video of him doing it with
George. He re-did the bass and piano.
Were you at those sessions when he was
redoing the bass and piano, or were you only
in attendance with Paul for the string
sessions?
No, I wasn’t. The sessions he was
doing, he did that in his own studios and he
did those things before he came to me. I
think I said to him: “It sounds beautiful,
Paul.” And he looked at me and he gave me
his look, like: “What are you going to say
now?” I said: “Well it might be a good idea
if we have a look at doing some strings, and
maybe some BVs [background vocals], and then
we improved the quality of John’s voice; I
think I made it a bit more sparse at the
beginning.
I had a bit of a bigger entry to it
originally, a bit more of aFree
As A Bird-type
entry. But I thought that once John’s voice
is clear and clean and he sounds so great
and it’s unmistakably john, let’s start with
John.
Was much of John’s piano kept from his demo
when you were able to separate it using the
de-mixing technology, or did Paul replay it?
Paul re-did the piano, because it had to be
re-done because the format of the song
changed. But I think that’s okay. If
anyone’s going to replace a Beatle, it
should be a Beatle.
Getting to work on what is now being said to
be the last Beatles song ever, there had to
be both excitement and trepidation. What did
you want to do, and what things did you want
to avoid?
Well, okay, I had Paul for a start. What we
talked about was trying not to be cheesy
with anything. I did the string arrangement;
I’m ripping off my dad [original producer
and ‘fifth Beatle’George
Martin]
quite a lot [laughs]. But it’s not a Beatles
tribute record, it’s a Beatles record. So we
were concerned about just doing the song
justice.
What was really exciting for me was watching
Paul’s total respect for his band members in
the process of doing this. The strings are
quite staccato; they’re quiteEleanor
Rigby,
if you like, and Paul was like: “Okay, the
rhythm that’s being played by George, can
you just isolate that? I want to hear what
George is doing. I want to make sure that we
are playing exactly the rhythm he is playing
and that we follow that on the record.”
Because as you pertinently asked the
question: what’s George doing on this? So
it’s really important that his contribution
is really respected and that we’re not
washing things out with too much colour.
Your father was a
master at string arrangements. What were
some of the things that, consciously or
unconsciously, you brought to that string
arrangement giving a little bit of a nod to
his brilliance?
Well, economy,
really. It’s funny, we did actually start
off with a bigger string section in the
room. On the track, it’s just a double
string quartet in the end, apart from the
guitar solo, which has a bigger, more sort
ofGolden
Slumbers vibe.
There’s like a line in the guitar solo which
is basically similar to the viola line that
he put inGolden
Slumbers.
There’s a line
at the very end of the guitars which is a
triplet line, and which is a veryI
Am The Walrus triplet-type
thing. They’re going all the time, so there
are conscious nods. But, as Paul says, I’m
not trying to do stuff for the sake of it.
I’m doing stuff because it’s The Beatles.
And if we’re going to do that, if you’re
going to do that with any artist, you must
do it with the artist that did in the first
place.
But none of the string players there knew
exactly what this was exactly for, correct?
It was a strange day, but yeah, why would
anyone even suspect it was for a Beatles
session, is the question. It’s funny, the
best way of hiding something is putting it
in plain sight.
Fans were hoping for aRubber
Soul box
this year, and it’s been rumoured thatAnthologycould
be in the works too. Can you give us any
hints on what could be coming next?
‘No’ is the answer [laughs].
But I can absolutely honestly say I’m not
working on anything at the moment. That’s
all I can say.
−
End of article.
Ottawa Beatles Site bonus feature: "Giles
Martin on Completing the Beatles"
January 25, 2024
Paul McCartney Interviewed: “Can you imagine
trying to start another band after The
Beatles?”
Paul McCartney speaks exclusively to MOJO
about the messy dissolution of The Beatles,
the impossible act of following them and
remembers his fallen Wings bandmate Denny
Laine.
ByWill
Hodgkinson for Mojo Magazine
MINIUTES BEFORE PAUL McCARTNEY
CALLS MOJO FROM BRAZIL, news comes
that Denny Laine has died.
“I heard that Denny was getting
better, there was hope for the
future, but obviously not,” says
McCartney of the singer and
guitarist who stuck with him in
Wings through good times and bad.
“It’s very sad because Denny was
great. Can you imagine trying to
start another band after The
Beatles? With Denny, we managed it.”
In the early ‘70s Paul McCartney
knew all about having work to do.
The end of the band against which
all others must be judged left him
in a depression, exacerbated not
only by feeling he had peaked aged
27 but also the law suit he filed on
December 31, 1970, in response toJohn
Lennon,George
HarrisonandRingo
Starrappointing
Allen Klein as Beatles manager. The
old gang fell apart. McCartney
needed a new gang. It turned out to
be his family.
“Yes, that was the feeling,” says
McCartney. “After the end of The
Beatles I was faced with certain
alternatives. One was to give up
music entirely and do God knows
what. Another was to start a
super-band with very famous people,
Eric Clapton and so on. I didn’t
like either so I thought: How did
The Beatles start? It was a bunch of
mates who didn’t know what they were
doing. That’s when I realised maybe
there is a third alternative: to get
a band that isn’t massively famous,
to not worry if we don’t know what
we’re doing because we would form
our character by learning along the
way. It was a real act of faith. It
was crazy, actually.”
The inspiration came, strangely
enough, from Johnny Cash. “We were
in bed one night,” he recalls,
“newly married, when Johnny Cash
came on the telly with a new band
he’d formed with Carl Perkins, a big
hero of mine. There they were,
playing with some country musicians
I had never heard of, looking like
they were having fun. I thought:
here’s Johnny, he’s back, he’s doing
it. So I turned to Linda and said:
Do you want to form a band? And she
went: ‘Sure.’ That’s how our
relationship was. Do you want to go
and live on a farm in Scotland? ‘Why
not?’”
Not just any farm in Scotland,
but one that would provide McCartney
with the solace he needed after the
dream of The Beatles ended in
litigation and despair. High Park
near Campbeltown is a surprisingly
modest three-bedroom farmhouse that
McCartney bought for £35,000 in June
1968 – a wise investment, given that
it went on to inspire McCartney and
Denny Laine’s 1977 mega hitMull
Of Kintyre. With 183 acres of
land, it was a refuge from Beatle
mania. It soon became a refuge from
The Beatles themselves.
“The greatest thing about High Park was
that in London, we were swimming through
treacle with business,” says McCartney,
still sounding pained at the memory. “Every
afternoon I had to go into the Apple office
to face the latest horrible development.
‘Allen Klein said this, and what do you
think of that?’ It was turgid, honestly a
bad, bad time. Here’s me, got into
rock’n’roll to have a good time, and now I
had this sluggish life, dragging my way
through one mess after another. Everything
at Apple was about dealing with old things,
and the brilliance of me and Linda was that
we wanted to do new things. She had a
romantic American dream of Scotland, which
was lovely because it cued into mine.”
McCartney, his 1970 solo album, featured
a back cover photograph of the singer in the
Scottish wilds, baby Mary poking out of his
sheepskin coat. Yet the declaration of rural
independence was a premature one. McCartney
vs Lennon, Harrison, Starkey and Apple Corps
opened on January 19, 1971 at the Royal
Courts Of Justice in London, with McCartney
engaging in the 11-day hearing to free
himself of their 10-year partnership
agreement, held onto by Klein, which meant
all proceeds from individual projects went
into the Beatles account. It also meant his
earnings were frozen and he and Linda were
living on her savings. McCartney wanted to
sue Klein, but since the turtleneck-clad New
Yorker had not been party to the original
Apple agreement he had to sue his former
bandmates instead.
“All these meetings were going on and
there would be a call: ‘You have to be in a
meeting at three o’clock.’ Suddenly it was:
Sorry, can’t make it, don’t live in London
any more. Now I’m on a farm in Scotland, and
like most of our decisions it was stupid and
brilliant at the same time. We got to know
each other, we got to farm, we got to be in
nature, we got to be free. With Klein I had
to resist every little thing, every decision
being made, while the others were very
gung-ho: ‘Yay, he’s great!’ It took them
years to say: ‘Actually, he isn’t so great.
And now we’re going to sue him.’”
“I wasn’t motivated by having a fabulous
group. I was motivated by not wanting to
leave my wife behind..." Get the latest
issue of MOJO to read a candid and emotional
interview with Paul McCartney about going
back to square one with Wings and the
debacle-fuelled creation of his greatest
album outside of The Beatles, Band On The
Run. More info and to order a copyHERE!
January 23, 2024
Handwritten draft of Beatles' 'Lovely Rita'
lyrics to be available at San Francisco
exhibition
By Timothy Karoff for SFGate
San Francisco is a city with frustratingly
expensive parking tickets. But next month, residents may clamor for a
chance to spend $650,000 on some kind words written about a parking
enforcement officer.
A notebook page of Paul McCartney’s handwritten lyrics for the Beatles’
“Lovely Rita” will be available for sale in February at the
56th California
International Antiquarian Book Fair, which will take place Feb. 9
through Feb. 11 on San Francisco’s Pier 27. The track, which is from the
B-side of the Beatles’ most famous album, “Sgt.
Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band,” is a cheery love song about a
fictional “meter maid” whom the speaker encounters doling out tickets.
The rare slice of Beatles’ history is priced at
well over half a million dollars. It’s the very first draft of the
song’s lyrics, according to the website of Biblioctopus Rare Books, the
company selling the page. (An especially eager fan could purchase the sheet
directly from the Biblioctopus website before the exhibition.)
The handwritten lyrics are scrawled in pen on a sheet of lined paper
torn out of a spiral-bound notebook. The sheet shows crossed-out words,
comments and alternative phrasings. It is sold framed, alongside the
“Sgt. Pepper” album art and a small plaque.
“These types of things don’t come onto the market that often, and
when they do they’re not always this significant,” Susan Benne, who
heads the Antiquarian Booksellers’ Association of America, told SFGATE.
ABAA is the organization behind February’s event.
The California International Antiquarian Book Fair is an annual
exhibition of rare and antique books, maps, manuscripts and photographs.
Other rare items include the original cover art of “The Left Hand of
Darkness” by speculative fiction legend Ursula K. Le Guin, as well as a
4-by-5-foot map of San Francisco from 1911.
CIRCA 1964: Rock and roll
band "The Beatles" pose for
a portrait wearing suits in
circa 1964. (L-R)Ringo
Starr, John Lennon, Paul
McCartney, George Harrison.
(Photo by Michael Ochs
Archives/Getty Images)
GETTY
The Beatles’s comeback single
“Now and Then” faced mixed reviews
from critics and some longtime fans
in 2023, but its lukewarm reception
didn't hinder its success on theBillboardcharts.
Months after its release, the tune
continues to thrive on one of the
company’s radio lists, surpassing
every other hit from the legendary
band.
“Now and Then” has now spent an
impressive 10 weeks onBillboard’sAdult
Alternative Airplay chart. The
weekly tally ranks tracks based on
their radio audience at stations
across the country, focusing on a
genre known as “adult alternative”—a
broad term for rock music that
appeals to a more mature crowd. This
frame, the tune dips slightly to No.
17 on the 40-spot tally.
With a 10 weeks now earned on the
Adult Alternative Airplay chart,
“Now and Then” stands as The
Beatles’s longest-running hit on the
ranking. In fact, it’s been there so
long, it has surpassed the combined
total of all their other charting
titles.
Apart from "Now and Then," The
Beatles have placed only two other
tracks on the Adult Alternative
Airplay chart. Given that the
ranking was established long after
the band’s prime, it’s not shocking
that most of their beloved classics
have never been able to accumulate
enough plays in a a tracking week to
make it to the tally.
Before "Now and Then," The
Beatles’s longest-running entry on
the Adult Alternative Airplay chart
was "Real Love." The tune spent five
weeks on the tally. Their most
recent release has now doubled that
duration.
The only other charting single on
the Adult Alternative Airplay list
from The Beatles is “Free as a
Bird.” The cut, which was released
around the same time as “Real Love,”
held on for three weeks in 1996.
Combined, their two hits from that
year have spent a total of eight
weeks on the roster.
“Now and Then” has
established itself as The Beatles’s
biggest single on the Adult
Alternative Airplay chart. Not only
has it outlasted any other hit from
the rock band, it also achieved a
higher peak. The single not only
secured The Beatles’s first top 10
but also clinched their only No. 1
on this particular chart.
January 19, 2024
Mona Best: How The Beatles got their start
from the ‘Mother of Merseybeat’ and Casbah
Coffee Club
By Kelly Scanlon for Far Out
(Credits: Far Out / Casbah Coffee
Club / Pete Best)
Unveiling the layers ofThe
Beatles‘ triumph almost feels like
uncovering a goldmine. While many associate
the 1960s rock ‘n’ roll scene with the
beloved quartet, there’s much more to the
story. Beyond the bobbing heads and
mop-style haircuts, one figure was the
crucial foundation for an enduring legacy
that spans decades: The ‘Mother of
Merseybeat’, Mona Best.
In the 1800s, years before anyone would
utter the names John, Paul, George or Ringo,
an unknown builder crafted a Victorian site
that the West Derby Conservative Club would
eventually take on. This particular house
was unique, unlike many other residences in
Liverpool. Nestled away from the bustling
road, this expansive house boasted 15
bedrooms and sprawled across a lush acre
(4,000 m2) of land.
The interiors exuded a cosy yet
mysterious atmosphere, with all rooms
adorned in deep shades of green or brown.
Once a wild oasis, the garden added to the
allure, while the cellar served a practical
purpose as a coal storage space. Mona Best
had been married to John Best for ten years
when her son, Rory, told her about the house
at 8 Hayman’s Green in 1954.
Recognising the excitement – and sheer
power – of owning your own coffee bar, one
that would become central to the burgeoning
music scene, Mona decked out her own cellar
so that her sons and their friends could
meet new people and enjoy current music. The
Casbah Coffee Club did many things that
others, likeThe
Cavern Club, didn’t, such as championing
rock ‘n’ roll musicians.
Unlike many other clubs at the time, the
Casbah also served cakes, snacks, soft
drinks, and coffee made with a coffee
machine. On the club’s official opening
night, Mona originally billed the Les
Stewart Quartet to play with George Harrison
on the guitar. However, the band fell
through after having a tiff, and Harrison
instead suggested two other friends who
could join him under the name The Quarrymen.
With 300 memberships already secured, the
trio of Paul McCartney, John Lennon, and
George Harrison convened at The Casbah to
secure their spot. Best, in her
characteristic candour, agreed to them
performing while acknowledging the
incomplete painting in the club. Rather than
leaving her to it, the band lent a hand to
complete the artwork. Cynthia Powell, who
would later become Lennon’s wife, painted
his silhouette on the wall — an artistic
detail that still graces the venue today.
The Casbah wasn’t just the first rock ‘n’
roll venue in Liverpool; it crafted an
entire culture that cemented the city’s
place, and later The Beatles’, as
world-class entities in the realm of music
talent. Moving from India in 1945, Mona
landed in a war-torn city, embodying
independence and free-spiritedness with her
charismatic and unconventional character.
Mona’s son, Pete Best, joined The
Quarrymen after his mother bought him a drum
kit so he could explore his musical
curiosity. His brother, Vincent ‘Roag’ Best,
holds the legacy of his mother and The
Casbah dear to his heart; his words about
her legacy and the world he continues to
thrive in coming from him like a vibrant
city still reeling from the fires of its
rich history.
Speaking toFar Outabout
his mother’s impact on the music scene, it’s
clear that all of her hard work still
ripples into the expanding corners of
Merseyside. “There was no women promotion,
she was the first to do that,” Roag
explains. “There’s so many groups that came
through The Casbah doors that went on and
had success. Obviously, the biggest being
the Beatles, and Mo gave them their start.”
Credits: Far Out / Casbah Coffee
Club / Pete Best)
Mona possessed more than just an interest
in the Fab Four: she believed in them. She
also became “business savvy”, as Roag
explains, and applied those skills to rock
‘n’ roll in an effort to support the band
and other potential talent. “It wasn’t just
like a pipe dream for her,” Roag states. “I
think she was just initially surprised that
it took off so quickly, but she knew she was
onto something. She started Casbah
promotions and realised that they were the
biggest drawing band. So she wanted them to
be on the top of the bill.”
The real game-changer arrived when The
Quarrymen came back from Hamburg, Germany,
as The Beatles. They enlisted the help of
Ringo Starr as their drummer in 1962 and
played The Casbah Coffee Club almost 300
times. “She felt that they had something,
especially when they when they came back
from Germany, because she gave John, Paul,
and George shows to begin with as The
Quarrymen,” Roag explains. “They literally
went through Liverpool, and other groups
followed. And then the whole thing kept
building and building and building, and we
know what happened in the end.”
There’s no textbook on how to create the
biggest, most popular band in all of music
history. Equally, the recipe is hard to put
into words. “They’re still the biggest and
most popular group in music history,” Roag
claims, and he’s absolutely right. Maybe it
was the impeccable blend of fortuitous
circumstances, an abundance of talent,
charisma, and a solid support system that
held unwavering belief in The Beatles’
potential. Or it was a sprinkle of fairy
dust — a phenomenon where the magic embedded
in music resonated most profoundly.
Or, it could very well have been Mona, a
genuine force of nature, a beacon of
unwavering determination. With her heart
firmly fixed on steering the music scene
toward its destined trajectory, Mona emerged
as the world’s first female rock ‘n’ roll
promoter. Her collaboration with unstoppable
talents like The Beatles set their
trajectory ablaze, propelling them into an
era of perpetual and well-deserved hype.
January 17, 2024
Paul McCartney Explains How the Beatles
Wouldn't Exist Without Chuck Berry
Here's his touching tribute to the
inventor of rock.
By Matt Miller for Esquire
(originally published March 21, 2017)
In early
1958, Chuck Berry released "Sweet Little
Sixteen," a song that would change the
course of music history. It ignited the urge
to celebrate rock and roll in kids
throughout America, but it also traveled the
world and influenced four boys in Liverpool
during their defining years.
"From the
first minute we heard the great guitar intro
to 'Sweet Little Sixteen,' we became fans of
the great Chuck Berry," Paul McCartney wrote
of the late Chuck Berry's influence on the
Beatles. "His stories were more
like poems than lyrics—the likes of 'Johnny
B. Goode' or 'Maybellene.' To us he was a
magician making music that was exotic yet
normal at the same time. We learnt so many
things from him which led us into a dream
world of rock 'n' roll music."
Five years
later, the Beatles recorded "Sweet Little
Sixteen" only once in London before storming
America in the winter of '64. During their
formative years, some of the Beatles'
biggest hits were covers of Berry songs. And
throughout the band's iconic career Berry's
influence was on nearly every album, from "I
Saw Her Standing There" off Please
Please Me to "Back in the
U.S.S.R." off the White Album.
"Chuck was and is forever more one of rock
'n' roll's greatest legends all over the
world," McCartney wrote in his tribute. "I
was privileged to meet him in his home town
St Louis when I played there on tour, and
it's a memory I will cherish forever. It's
not really possible to sum up what he meant
to all us young guys growing up in Liverpool
but I can give it a try."
It's hard to imagine the Beatles without
Chuck Berry paving the way for them, but
then again it's impossible to imagine last
half-century of music as a whole without the
inventor of rock.
How can I explain Chuck Berry’s legacy to
future St. Louisans?
St. Louis Sage remembers the legend.
By St. Louis Sage for St. Louis
(originally published April 20, 2017)
John Lennon said it best: “If you tried
to give rock ’n’ roll another name, you
might call it Chuck Berry.” Charles Edward
Anderson Berry was arguably the first to
create the brash new music that became a
rallying cry for generations of rebellious
youth. “School Days” and “You Can’t Catch
Me” captured the urges and anxieties of
adolescence, and backbeat rockers like
“Johnny B. Goode” and “Roll Over Beethoven”
drove them to dance those cares away.
Berry grew up in The Ville, a black
neighborhood on the North Side that was then
middle-class. After shocking his devout
parents by stealing a car at gunpoint, he
landed in reform school, where he started a
singing quartet and launched his performing
career. He was released on his 21st
birthday, got bored working at auto plants,
and decided to become a beautician,
enrolling at Poro College to study
cosmetology.
Along the way, he played in clubs,
eventually joining Johnnie Johnson’s trio
and performing regularly at the Cosmopolitan
Club in East St. Louis. His unique brand of
string-bending blues attracted both white
and black devotees to what he called “salt
and pepper clubs” across the region.
As the gigs multiplied, he began
traveling beyond St. Louis, eventually
meeting his idol, Muddy Waters, who hooked
him up with Chess Records. Berry had a
rocked-up version of the country song “Ida
Red” that he called “Ida May,” but Chess
wanted a new name. (Johnson credited a box
of mascara named “Maybellene”; Berry
remembered a cow with that name from a
childhood storybook.) The song shot up to
No. 1 on the R&B charts, then No. 5 on the
pop charts, and a young singer named Elvis
Presley began performing it.
It was one of Berry’s later records that,
in 1961, brought Mick Jagger and Keith
Richards together. It was “Johnny B. Goode”
that was launched into space in 1977. And it
was Berry’s signature “duck walk” that
Michael J. Fox imitated in 1985’sBack
to the Future—a spot-on choice,
considering that, asThe
New York Timesnoted,
Berry “understood what the kids wanted
before they knew themselves.”
He was impulsive and restless and had to
fight racism and piracy every step of the
way. Flaws and genius were bound up together
in this man, and though the world claimed
him as a rock god, he never wandered far
from home. He put down stakes on 35 acres
outside Wentzville, and he made Blueberry
Hill his base. Now he’s gone, but the music
he forged here—imbued with his life’s
struggles and pain and exuberant joy—will
live forever.
Top 5 songs that climbed the highest on
theBillboard Hot 100
#1: “My Ding-a-Ling” (1972)
#8: “Nadine (Is It You?)”(1964)
#10: “No Particular Place to Go”
(1964)
#14: “You Can Never Tell”(1964)
#18: “Carol”(1958)
Paul McCartney’s School Teacher Alan Durband is
Interviewed (1965) Posted on Youtube by Emma
January 13, 1969 - UK Release of Yellow
Submarine!
January 16, 2024
George Harrison Songwriting and Recording
Originally published in Hit
Parader, April 1969
The Records The Beatles Never Wanted You
To Hear By Andrew of Parlogram Auctions
Beatles bootlegs have
been around for over 50 years. In this
video we look back at how they began and
how the coming of the CD in the late
1980s saw an explosion of high quality
releases by pirates who serviced a gap
in the market which Apple has still to
completely fill. Whilst it is illegal to
make or sell bootleg material, showing
and discussing it is not.
January 14, 2024
The Beatles Cartoon: How the Fab Four Came to Saturday Mornings
The Beatles pose in front of
animated cartoons of
themselves in London on 11th
November 1964
Photo credit: Mark and
Colleen Hayward/Redferns
Do you remember The Beatles
cartoon? No,notthe
one in which John, Paul, George and
Ringo travel with an old man in a
yellow submarine, meet some blue
guys and save the world at the end
with their music.Thisone
was born out ofBeatlemania,
and brought an animated version of
the Fab Four toSaturday
morning televisionat
a time when actual people werenotthe
subject of cartoons.
“It began — as so much did back
then — on February 9, 1964,”
explainsMitchell
Axelrod, author ofBeatletoons:
The Story Behind the Cartoon Beatles,
“with The Beatles making their
American debut onThe
Ed Sullivan Show.When
impresario Sullivan introduced them
with the words, ‘Ladies and
gentlemen, The Beatles…,’nothingwould
ever be the same again. Certainly
not the people who watched that
broadcast, one of whom was struck
with an idea, which led to an
innovative plan involving the
British band, a lot of chutzpa and
Saturday morning cartoons.”
A gentleman by the name of Al
Brodax had, at the time, established
himself as a producer of cartoons
based on King Features syndicated
comic strips, among themBeetle
Bailey, Krazy KatandSnuffy
Smith. Additionally, Brodax and his
team had produced — in just 18
months —220 new cartoons featuringPopeye
the Sailor.
What he hadnotsuspected
was that producing so much in so
short a span of time would actually
enhance his career beyond anything
he could have imagined. And while
the details surrounding how he got
involved with the Fab Four — which
in turn would lead to the production
ofThe Beatlescartoon
— have gotten a bit cloudy over the
years, there’s no denying the fact
that Brodax was the creative genius
behind the venture.
Notes Axelrod, “Al Brodax
claimed that when he saw the group
perform that Sunday night on the
Sullivan show, he quickly called
their manager, Brian Epstein, at his
hotel in New York City.
Unsurprisingly, everyone was chasing
after Brian to inquire about The
Beatles, so one can only imagine how
tied up that phone line must have
been following their incredible
performance that Sunday night. It
would seem to be virtually
impossible to get through, but
somehow Al Brodax did.
Brian’s secretary Wendy answered the
phone.”
The conversation, he says, went something
like this:
WENDY: “Hello, Brian Epstein’s room.”
AL BRODAX: “Hi, my name is Al Brodax and
I think I can help The Beatles. Can you hold
on a moment; I have another call?”
“With that,” laughs Axelrod, “he put his
associate, Mary Ellen Stewart, on the phone
with Wendy. He was lucky enough to
actually get through to Brian’s hotel room
and he put themon hold!Thatis
the word chutzpa personified. Luckily
enough, the ladies chatted for a while and
became phone buddies. Andthatis
how Al Brodax said he got his foot in the
door to the world of The Fab Four.”
The Fab plan unfolds
The producer’s concept was to use
The Beatles in animated form on television
each week. Speaking to the group’s lawyer,
Brodax secured the rights to do the Beatles
cartoon. “According to Brodax,” the author
shares, “The Beatles’ management company was
not too strict about approvals of anything
at that time. Having secured the rights, it
was time to announce to the world that The
Beatles, currently the hottest thing in the
entertainment industry, would be the subject
of a half hour cartoon series. No one knew
exactly how long Beatlemania would last, but
Brodax did know that he didn’t
have time to waste.”
The first announcement of the
Beatles cartoon in development came in the
pages of Daily Variety in
November 1964, calling for the show to begin
airing in the fall of 1965. The challenge
for Team Brodax, of course, was to get the
characters designed, find scriptwriters,
audition for voices, seek out a studio to
create the magic, and find
sponsors for the show — all in less than a
year! But Brodax managed to accomplish it
all, sponsors coming in the form of A.C.
Gilbert (maker of Erector Sets and American
Flyer trains), Quaker Oats and Mars Candy
Company, with the network turning out to be
ABC. At this point it was April of 1965,
less than six months before the show was
scheduled to debut.
W
riters were hired and provided
the format of the show: two five-and-a-half
minute Beatles adventures based on one of
their songs with two sing-along segments.
Brodax recalled to Axelrod, “We did a lot of
theme things about subjects such as ghosts,
cowboys, ships at sea, Transylvania and
things of that nature. We had ten-minute
meetings about the stories, and that was
it.” It was up to the writers to turn them
into the scripts.
For the studio, a small London-based one
called TV Cartoons (TVC) got the job. “With
the writers and studio now in place, Brodax
still needed to have the group’s characters
designed in cartoon form so TVC could
animate the series,” Axelrod details. “The
very formidable task of designing the
cartoon Beatles went to a nineteen-year-old
kid with a Beatle haircut named Peter
Sander. He worked at TVC and used
pictures that the studio had been given of
The Beatles in order to come up with basic
characters that the animators could draw in
a simple style, and, most importantly, in a
quick manner.”
Norman Kauffman, a production assistant
at TVC, told the author that he remembered
the model sheets designed by Sander.
“Peter,” he said, “used what had been the
typical ‘Beatles stereotypes’ at that time,
where John was seen as the leader, Paul was
the most poised and stylish, George was
portrayed as loose-limbed and angular, while
Ringo was seen as the nice, gentle, but
always rather sad-looking, Beatle.”
The task of
finding the actors to portray the voices of
the group was the final piece of the series
puzzle. “The choices made by Brodax and his
team are quite possibly the main reason that
most fans are unfamiliar with the series
unless they were watched in their original
broadcasts in the 1960s or the syndicated
version in the 1970s,” Axelrod opines. “The
team at King Features had planned for this
series to be seen on American television. Brodax
felt that if he hired voice actors from The
Beatles’ hometown of Liverpool, no American
child would understand the accents. He
wanted the voices to be what he called an
‘Americanized’ version of a Liverpool
accent. Overall, there was some give and
take on this issue and a compromise was
struck.”
For the voices of Paul and Ringo, British
actorLance
Percivalwas chosen.
He was already in the entertainment business
and had known The Beatles. He remembered
portraying Paul as “bright and cheerful” and
Ringo as “the low-voiced fall guy for the
humor.”
“The actor chosen to voice John and
George was Paul
Frees,” says Axelrod, “which was a
major point of contention then, and
continues to be so to this day. Frees is an
icon of animation and voice-over work. His
name might not sound familiar, but his voice
on television and in film certainly is. He
was the voice of Boris Badenov in the Rocky
and Bullwinkle Show, and Inspector
Fenwick from Dudley Do-Right.
He portrayed voices in countless cartoons,
including most of the Rankin-Bass Christmas
special beloved to this day. So why would
the voice of such an icon of entertainment
be so controversial as two of
The Beatles?”
Jack Stokes, director of the series at
TVC, summed it up best: “The voices sounded
nothing like The Beatles’ own Liverpool
accents. Just some daft idea of how we
English sounded to Americans.”
The Race is On!
John Lennon inspects the drawings
for the Beatles cartoon series at
the TVC studios in London, 11th
November 1964
Photo credit: Mark and Colleen
Hayward/Getty Images
Back in 1965 there were only a few months
to go and although the puzzle pieces were
all in place, no work had actually begun on
the series, so what followed was a fast and
furious pace, resulting in animation
suffering in terms of detail. But
productionwasin
full swing, though there was one more thing
that needed addressing.
King Features and TVC wanted The Beatles
to see the progress on the show that would
immortalize (or demoralize) them in cartoon
form. The date was July 30, 1965,
which was the day after the group attended
the premiere of their second motion picture,Help! They
were also rehearsing for their live
performance on the UK seriesBlackpool
Night Outon August 1, so they
were exhausted.
The small offices of TVC were transformed
into a screening and reception area and some
of the production team, along with an ABC UK
film crew, were on hand as The Beatles
walked in to see their animated counterparts
for the very first time. The lights
were dimmed as the group was shown two
completed episodes. When it was over, the
reaction of the group was initially positive
“They liked it at first,” recalled Lance
Percival. “It was an ego thing, but then
they got picky. I didn’t hear what John was
saying but Paul was sitting in front of me
asking who was doing his voice. Ringo was
okay with it all, and he commented that I
made him the dum-dum, and I told him that it
wasn’t me, it was how the scripts were
written.”
The screening soon became one big
party as the food and the booze began to
flow. At one point someone noticed that
John Lennon was missing. The TVC staff was
ordered to “find John Lennon.” After a
brief search, Norman Kauffman found him
hiding under one of the buffet tables. He
was tired and didn’t feel like being a
Beatle for a few minutes, so he went and
hid. Kauffman tried to coax John out, but he
simply wasn’t ready to exit. Instead, John
asked Kauffman to get him a bottle of wine,
which he enjoyed under the table for a bit.
Beatle singalongs
It was Saturday, September 25, 1965, at
10:30 A.M. Eastern Standard Time. The show
was finally about to premiere. The first
cartoon to be seen was “A Hard Day’s Night,”
which found the group trying to find a quiet
place to rehearse, which was Transylvania
where monstrous mayhem ensued. Two sing-alongs
and another adventure later, the ratings
waiting game was on.
“By this time, The Beatles had
conquered the planet but would their
popularity, fame and gold records translate
to ratings gold?” Axelrod asks
rhetorically. “ABC would have to wait
approximately two weeks for word about
whether their ground-breaking cartoon show
was worth the enormous gamble taken by all
parties involved. It was. The
Beatles cartoon opened with an almost
unprecedented 51.9 share of the viewing
audience. In America, the show became a
Saturday morning success, airing two seasons
of new episodes and three of reruns. Yet
another aspect of Beatlemania in American,
born, like so much else, out of February 9,
1964.”
January 11, 2024
What's in Store in 2024 for The Beatles &
This Channel
By Andrew for Parlogram Auctions
2023 was an incredible year for
Beatles fans. But what does 2024 hold in
store? In this video we look at the state of
vinyl as we enter the new year and more
importantly what releases are planned and
hoped for in the year ahead. We also tell
you our plans for the channel this coming
year and what exciting projects we already
have lined up for you.
Flashback: In 1965 VJ Records releases "Log
Cabin" by Billy Preston, promotes it in
Billboard magazine
It's interesting tolearn that the Fifth Beatle,
Billy Preston, was a recording
artist on VJ Records. The record company
believed that "Log Cabin" was a hit
contender, so much so that an advertisement
appeared in Billboard magazine. It doesn't
sound much like Billy Preston when you hear
his vocals, but the vocal intonations are there
of a young wannabe pop star. However, the
song that really shines on this single is an
instrumental called "Drown In My Own Tears".
This track showcases Billy's musical
professionalism when he performs on the
Hammond Organ. If you loved Billy's work
with the Beatles, a jaunt back to his early
recordings is worth experiencing. −
John Whelan, Ottawa Beatles Site.
Above: Screen-grab of Billy Preston.
"Drown In My Own Tears" - Billy
Preston
"Log Cabin" - Billy Preston
Also, found this interesting Billboard
write-up on the Beatles
Also known as The Russian Album, Paul
McCartney'sChoba
B CCCPrecord
helped to bridge the gap between east and
west long before the USSR's fall
The Beatles’affiliation
with theSoviet
Unionwas turbulent to
say the least. While their music had
been a valuable commodity among British
and American youth during theSwinging
Sixties, the slightly less impressed
Soviet press officially declaredthe
Fab Fouras the “belch
of Western culture.”
Yet, though theWhite
Album’s “Back in the USSR” was intended
as a satire on American idealism, it was
interpreted by parts of the West as anadvert
for communism.
Although regularly denied the
opportunity to perform there,Paul
McCartneymaintained an
affinity with the region. In 1988,
inspired by new leader Mikhail
Gorbachev’s pledge of openness and
transparency, the Liverpudlian decided
to offer a peace gesture inrock
n' roll form: acovers
albumthat would be
released in the Soviet Union only.
The making of Choba B CCCP
The idea forChoba B CCCP,
the Russian translation of “Back in the
USSR”, came about essentially by
accident.
Following the underwhelming response to
1986’s experimentalPress
to Playand the scrapping
of an entire album produced by Phil
Ramone, McCartney appeared to have lost
his musical mojo.
But thanks to nostalgic jam
sessions with the likes of Elvis Costello,
Trevor Horn and Johnny Marr, the star
quickly rediscovered it. Soon after, he hit
the studio to lay down 22 of his early rock
n' roll favourites.
Many of the chosen tracks were already
part of Beatles folklore. Eddie
Cochran’s “Twenty Flight Rock,” for
example, was the song McCartney
impressedJohn
Lennonwith during
their first meeting, ultimately leading
to an offer to join The Quarrymen.
Little Richard’s “Kansas City” was a
staple of the Scousers’ setlist during
their Hamburg years and was later
recorded on their fourth LPBeatles
for Sale.
And Fats Domino’s “Ain’t That A Shame”
andElvis
Presley’s“Just
Because” had previously been covered by
Lennon on his similarly-themed 1975 solo
swan songRock ‘n’ Roll.
Paul McCartney's Soviet sensation
Unlike his former bandmate’s tribute,
however, McCartney’swasn’t
intended for global consumption
(although the songwriter did initially
plan an unorthodox UK release designed
to resemble a smuggling operation).
After receiving several vinyl copies
boasting Russian-language covers as a
present from his manager, Macca hit upon
the brainwave of regifting it to the
Soviet public.
The bassist subsequently agreed a deal
with Melodiya, a state-owned record
label, which would see 400,000 copies of
the album hit the shelves, but only in
the Red Empire.
It was a warmly accepted gesture. The
11-track edition’s first run was an
instant sell out. Likewise, the expanded
edition, which added Bobby Mitchell &
The Toppers’ “I’m Gonna Be A Wheel
Someday” andGeorge
Gershwinstandard
“Summertime” to the track list, which
arrived three months later.
The Russian Album goes west
Credit: Lear 21 at English
Wikipedia,CC
BY-SA 3.0,
via Wikimedia Commons. After the
Berlin wall came down,Choba
B CCCPfound
listeners in the West
Of course, the appetite for all things
Beatles is so insatiable that copies
quickly found their way onto the
international black market.
Those who paid £500 to get their hands
on one would undoubtedly have felt
aggrieved whenChoba B СССРlater
got an official worldwide release in the
wake of the Soviet Union’s 1991
collapse, charting in the UK at No.63
and at No.109 on the other side of the
Atlantic (eight tracks also showed up as
B-sides during the late Eighties).
These might not have been the lofty
positions that the former Wings frontman
was used to. But as he explained on his
official website, the number one spot
wasn’t the goal: “I knew it wouldn’t be
a big chart-topping thing, but I knew it
would be a collectible. People would be
like, ‘Have you heard about this?!’ Word
of mouth, you know.”
Return to Red Square
This wasn’t the end of McCartney’s
Russian connections, though. In 2003, he
finally got the opportunity to play in
the country, a historical event captured
for posterity on the Grammy-nominated
live DVDPaul McCartney in
Red Squaretwo years later.
“It was a mystical land then,” he wrote
in memoirThe Lyricsabout
his long-awaited trip. “It's nice to see
the reality. I always suspected that
people had big hearts. Now I know that's
true.”
Nor was it Macca’s last covers album. He
also doffed his cap to the rock n' roll
classics he grew up with on 1999’sRun
Devil Run, allowing fans to finally hear
his take on “No Other Baby,” The Vipers
song that had been left offСНОВА
B СССР.
And then in 2011, the Grammy-winningKisses
on the Bottomsaw McCartney
put his own spin onGreat
American Songbookclassics
such as “I’m Gonna Sit Right Down and
Write Myself a Letter,” “Bye Bye
Blackbird” and “It’s Only a Paper
Moon.”
But it’s the self-described “crazy
little Russian release” that remains
McCartney’s most intriguing and, judging
by 1989’s commercial return to
write Flowers in the Dirt, most
rejuvenating trip down memory lane.
January 9, 2024
Why you should definitely own Klaatu's debut
album, and it's got nothing to do with The
Beatles
When the mysterious Klaatu released their
first album, rumours about the musicians'
identity sent sales soaring... but it's an
album that stands up on its own
Infinitely more famous for the heated speculation that surrounded the
identity of the creators of the record than for the record itself, the debut
album from
Klaatu nevertheless remains a fine example of radio-friendly yet psychedelic
mid-70s pop-rock.
The album was mysteriously released in a sleeve that featured a smiling sun
rising over a hill strewn with mushrooms and butterflies, but bore no credits
for the musicians or the producer behind it. The mystique was heightened when it
was revealed that nobody from Capitol Records had even met the band by the time
the label released Klaatu in the summer of 1976.
It was a journalist in Rhode Island who first put two and two together and
came up with five, initiating rumours that Klaatu were none other than The
Beatles and that Klaatu was a long-lost, anonymously issued follow-up
to Revolver.
His ‘evidence’ was flimsy to say the
least: The Fab Four had shelved an album
before their own 1970 break-up; Klaatu was
the name of an alien in the sci-fi film
The Day The Earth Stood Still, in which
the actor Michael Rennie had appeared;
coincidentally, Rennie had also been
pictured at the door of a spaceship that
appeared on Ringo Starr’s Goodnight
Vienna album; The Beatles and Klaatu
also shared the same record company in North
America; further parallels were drawn
between Klaatu’s track Sub-Rosa Subway
and Paul McCartney’s solo album Red Rose
Speedway.
Meanwhile, the silence from Klaatu was
deafening. Consequently, Rolling Stone
awarded them Hype Of The Year 1977, and
NME ran the headline ‘Deaf Idiot
Journalist Starts Beatle Rumour’. But by
then Klaatu had already sold more
than 600,000 copies.
Klaatu were in fact a trio of studio
musicians from Toronto (ironically, a city
that John Lennon’s persecution by the CIA
had caused him to consider relocating to)
led by multi-instrumentalist and singer
Terry Draper. None of the trio had a
pedigree of any real significance, but they
all had talent in abundance. It also later
transpired that Klaatu was produced by Terry
Brown, of Rush, Voivod and Max Webster
fame.
A mostly lightweight and provocatively
arranged album, Klaatu (called 3:47 EST in
Canada) begins with its best-known song
(though not necessarily its best); The
Carpenters later took Calling Occupants Of
Interplanetary Craft into America’s Top 40,
Richard and Karen having wisely retained the
original’s spirit, even spicing up its coda
with an inspired hard rock guitar solo. Klaatu’s version still has a beautiful
pleading innocence that is hard to beat.
Elsewhere, Draper and fellow member John
Woloschuk display their best
Lennon/McCartney harmonies on the Beach
Boys-influenced California Jam. Based on a
riff inspired by The Doors’ Roadhouse Blues,
the spirited Anus Of Uranus is followed by
the lavish commercial tones of SubRosa
Subway.
Klaatu add an intelligent twist to the
era’s bubblegum sound with True Life Hero,
and tiptoe soothingly through Doctor Marvello before
Sir Bodsworth Rubblesby III
lives up to its eccentric title, coming on
like The Muppets jamming with Genesis.
Finally, Little Neutrino sprawls across
eight-and-a-half minutes of spacey,
symphonic exploration.
The Beatles returned in 2023 with their
first new single in decades, much to the
delight of fans. The band’s “Now And Then”
cleverly utilized artificial intelligence
technology to allow all four members of the
group to contribute to the tune–even though
half of the outfit is no longer with us.
“Now And Then” became a quick hit on manyBillboardcharts,
but on most of those, it didn’t hold on very
long.
The single is still present on a handful
ofBillboardrankings
to this day, months after it was released.
As the cut continues to perform well, it has
not only become a welcome win for the group,
but their longest-charting hit single on a
number of lists.
“Now And Then” has spent the most time on
the Hot Rock & Alternative Songs chart. That
tally ranks the most-consumed rock and
alternative tracks in the U.S., as its name
suggests. The list uses a methodology that
combines sales, streams, and radio airplay
to show what rocking tunes America loves.
As of this frame, “Now And Then” has
spent nine weeks on the Hot Rock &
Alternative Songs chart. That’s the longest
stay The Beatles have ever managed on the
ranking. Before this latest smash, their
longest-running hit was “Here Comes the
Sun.” That cut held on for half a dozen
turns.
“Now and Then” has been falling down the
Hot Rock & Alternative Songs chart for
weeks, but it probably won’t disappear for a
little while. The tune is still sitting
pretty at No. 37 on the 50-spot tally, so it
may soon become their first hit to spend
double-digit turns on the ranking.
Over on the similar Hot Rock Songs
chart, “Now And Then” has racked up nearly
as many weeks. This frame, it’s up to eight
turns on the tally. Just as is the case on
the Hot Rock & Alternative Songs list, the
track recently passed “Here Comes The Sun”
as the longest-running winner, beating its
six stints on the roster.
“Now And Then” is also performing
well at rock radio stations across the U.S.,
which were initially eager to play something
brand new from the most successful rock band
of all time. On the Adult Alternative
Airplay chart, the recent single didn’t have
as many other cuts from the same outfit to
pass when it comes to longevity, but it’s
still managed to become the Fab Four’s
biggest hit so far.
“Now And Then” didn’t just give the
group their first No. 1 on the Adult
Alternative Airplay tally, it has now become
their longest-charting smash as well. The
track has lived on the list for eight
weeks–beating the five that “Real Love”
accomplished in the mid-’90s.
It’s been a few years since Paul
McCartney scored a new solo hit on the Hot
100. While he may not be enticing the public
with his newer material–at least not on the
grand scale he used to–some of his older
tracks are still incredibly popular. This
week, one of his most beloved compositions
reaches a new peak position on the
competitive roster, decades after it was
first released.
McCartney’s “Wonderful Christmastime”
rises once again on this week’s Hot 100. The
tune lifts to No. 26, a new best placement
for the track on the weekly ranking of the
most-consumed songs in the U.S.
Before this frame, the highest that
“Wonderful Christmastime” had climbed on the
Hot 100 was No. 28. Now, in its lucky
thirteenth turn on the tally, it’s bested
that position—and it could climb even higher
next year.
Last week, McCartney’s tune was down at
No. 36, and it seemed like it might not have
a shot at reaching its previously-set
peak–or even beating it–this year. Somehow,
the track gained massively in consumption in
the past tracking period, leaping over a
number of other popular Christmas cuts from
musical superstars.
“Wonderful Christmastime” is one of many
holiday songs that return to the Billboard
charts around the end of every year.
McCartney is included in a group of
legendary artists who don't usually appear
on the tally these days, but who can now
count on their Christmas cuts to bring them
back. The roundup includes names like the
Jackson 5, Dean Martin, Frank Sinatra, Perry
Como, and many others.
McCartney released “Wonderful
Christmastime” in 1979 as a standalone
single. At the time, it was not a big hit,
and it failed to reach the Hot 100 for the
first few decades it was out in the world.
In fact, the title didn’t debut on the
competitive chart until 2018, but now it’s
making up for lost time each season.
− End of article.
Fun Facts:
On December 21, 2017, Jesse
Kinos-Goodin, journalist for the CBC
declared:
"Wonderful Christmastime" is played so
much every holiday season that Forbesestimated
it earns McCartney $400,000 to $600,000 US a
year. Basic math would tell us that, since
its release in 1979, it's brought in roughly
$15 million US, almost half of his estimated
annual earnings of $20 to $30 million.
On January 3, 2024, Matt Friedlander
for American Songwriter declared: "Paul
McCartney Nabs Another No. 1 Hit, Ruling
Atop a Pair of ‘Billboard’ Charts"
Paul McCartney ended an eventful 2023
by adding a couple more Billboard chart
milestones to his long list of career
achievements. A cover of McCartney’s
1979 holiday classic “Wonderful
Christmastime” by Nigeria-born artist
Blessing Offor landed
at No. 1 on twoBillboardcharts–the Christian
Airplay and Christian
AC Airplay tallies–late last
month.
January 4, 2024
Highlights from Paul McCartney's 'Got
Back' Tour in Brazil
George Harrison remarks on Jackie Lomax
This is where Jackie Lomax performed
Sour Milk Sea at the Savoy Tivoli in
San Francisco 1976.
Why the Beatles Made Us Look
And what their fashion choices said about the charged-up era in which they reigned.
By Dorothy Woodend for the Tyee
Fashioning the Beatles:
The Looks That Shook the World
Deirdre
Kelly
Sutherland House Books
(2023)
Rock star clothes. When
you read those words, what comes immediately
to mind? Elvis’s blue suede shoes, Jimi
Hendrix’s fur and feathers, the whirling
dervish capes of Stevie Nicks? Or the
Beatles in their varied sartorial glory?
Toronto journalist
Deirdre Kelly’s new book,Fashioning
the Beatles: The Looks That Shook the World,
takes on the quartet of trendsetters, from
the earliest incarnation of the band,
leather-jacketed and greased up, to the
later peacock period of Sgt. Pepper. It’s an
encompassing look at how the band influenced
culture, and how culture shaped them.
A longtime Beatles fan, Kelly came to her
subject quite intuitively. But in any period
of deep research, it’s the unexpected
perambulations and tangents that prove the
most fascinating.
The Beatles may have set the tone for
style, but the various cultural epochs
through which they lived were indicative of
how much fashion is reflective of the
greater zeitgeist. The tumultuous years
spanning the mid-1950s to the 1970s saw some
of the most radical cultural shifts in the
20th century. And fashion occupied an
interesting place — it drove and was driven
by changes in the fabric of society.
Kelly’s deep dive is fascinating stuff. A
buffet of style, the book overflows with
anecdotes, photos, band lore and stories
about the differing social periods that the
Beatles traversed.
The Tyee posed a few
questions to Kelly about the band, the
clothes and, of course, the music. This
interview has been lightly edited for length
and clarity.
The Tyee: I was
kind of surprised that no one had ever
written about the Beatles and their
relationship to fashion, given how immediate
and overt it was.
Did you have one
of those epiphany-type moments or was it a
gradual realization that this was a
motherlode of a subject yet to be fully
explored?
Deirdre Kelly: It is
very much a short answer — it was an
epiphany. I did mention this a bit in the
acknowledgments to the book because it
really was an idea that I must credit to my
husband.
So now here’s the long
version: I have done two books prior to
this, both with Vancouver publisher
Greystone Books. I had wanted to do a third
book, and we were in discussions about it
being a fashion book because at the time I
had been reassigned to the fashion beat at
the Globe and Mail.
The thought was to capitalize on my
expertise, much as we had done with
my Ballerina book, which stemmed from my
decades working as a dance critic for
Canada’s national newspaper.
There was a lot of back and forth with
proposals and ideas, all in pursuit of a
subject that hadn’t been written about
before. It was hard to find one. So, it was
just one of those moments where I was
bellyaching really to my long-suffering
husband, who was trying to make himself a
coffee in our kitchen.
I was yammering at him,
bemoaning my inability to come up with a
topic that had not been much examined
before. I thought he was ignoring me, but
then without lifting his head from the
stirring of his Nescafé, he quietly said
that I had it all wrong.
“Your next book has to be about the
Beatles,” he said.
With hands on hips, and convinced now he
really hadn’t heard a word I had been
saying, I impatiently inquired, “Why?”
And he said, “Because you are Beatles
obsessed.”
“True,” I responded. “But what could I
possibly ever say about the Beatles that
hasn’t been said before?”
And then, only because I had fashion on
the brain and wanted to bring the
conversation back to what was vexing me, I
said, “Unless, of course, I was to write
about their fashion.” I had meant it as a
joke, but as soon as I said the words
“Beatles” and “fashion,” practically in the
same sentence, I became rooted to the spot.
In reading your
book, I was struck by details and aspects of
their performances that I’d never really
thought about before. I’m thinking about the
rendition of “Get Back” on top of the roof
of Apple headquarters, and the respective
outfits worn by each band member. After
reading that chapter, I rewatched the video,
and knowing more about what they were
wearing added another layer of complexity
and nuance to the action.
This was
something of a pattern, with clothing
manifesting the inner workings of the band —
from unitedly cute to something more
complicated and adult.
But you make the point that even
when they were on the verge of dissolution,
they still dressed/looked like a group. Was
fashion something of an unspoken but still
binding force throughout?
Yes. Fashion was a bond.
It was there at the beginning and there at
the end, a shared passion as much as music.
John, Paul, George and Ringo understood the
power of clothes to create an identity and
reflect a mindset. They dressed not just for
success but for self-expression, and to make
themselves noticed for being different than
any other group that had come before them or
would follow.
The Beatles dressed to be true to
themselves. They were style leaders who
became the biggest trendsetters of their
era, even when that had never been the goal.
For a group so exhaustively,
almost forensically covered, was there
particularly surprising information that
emerged in researching the book? The
Canadian connection with the story of Le
Château and the velvet jumpsuits is a
corker. The details of the Abbey Road cover
are also fascinating.
Thanks for mentioning that. John Lennon’s
Le Château black velour jumpsuit,
immortalized in the cover of the Hey
Jude album, was
definitely a revelation for me. It took me
years to uncover its Canadian origins. I
thought it was European at first, from a
designer such as Ted Lapidus, one of the
first couturiers to triumph in what was
called unisex fashion. I received
confirmation from Le Château founder
Herschel Segal himself. He had met John and
Yoko in Montreal in 1969 at their bed-in.
There were other surprises, besides —
George jump-starting the acid-wash denim
trend, for example, and discovering
corduroy, which the Beatles popularized, was
initially an unfashionable cloth, reserved
for the working class.
By wearing corduroy as
they did — jackets and even customized
footwear to match their bespoke outfits —
the Beatles signalled their essential
nonconformist and subversive nature.
There’s a quote in the latter
part of the book where John Lennon
references how the band’s changing styles
affected public perception of them: “I guess
they didn’t like how the image was looking.
No reason to protect us for being soft and
cuddly anymore — so bust us!”
As the band grew out of their
mop-top phase and left behind their more
innocent look, how did fashion play a part
in this maturation and individuation
process?
Fashion mirrored what
was going on with the Beatles at every stage
of the game. That’s what ultimately makes it
such a fascinating topic. It’s not just
clothing. It’s a band identity, and a
reflection of the quest for artistic
innovation and excellence.
The Beatles were no slouches. They worked
extremely hard, held to a punishing schedule
of creative output — especially during the
Beatlemania period — and pushed themselves
relentlessly forward, to the toppermost of
the poppermost, as John used to say.
Their artistic evolution was a constant,
resulting in no two records ever sounding
the same and a dazzling array of looks that
changed as they changed, season to season,
album to album.
When they dressed in suits — something they
all wanted to do despite what you might have
read — it was to enable them to reach a new
mass audience through the new medium of
television.
They were cunning and canny about that,
believing (quite rightly, it turned out)
that a change of dress would presage a
change of fortune. They dressed alike in
those days as a matter of course for the
stage. But they are so in synch that they
often dressed alike even when they didn’t
need to.
As they matured as musicians and as men,
they never lost their bond through clothing.
The garments might not have been identical,
but they continued to showcase a shared
sensibility.
Their fashion choices also reflected the
volatility of their era, a time when
creativity and youth usurped tradition and
the status quo as cultural imperatives. It
was all intimately connected.
Can you talk about your own relationship
with the Beatles, how you first came to
listen to them? Do have a favourite fashion
period for the band? Also, I have to ask, a
favourite Beatle?
The Beatles have been a part of my life
since I can remember. Their music was a
constant for me growing up, on the radio,
and on vinyl. I was 10 when I bought my
first Beatles album with my own money —Magical
Mystery Tour.
The single “I Am the Walrus” bewitched me as
soon as I heard it on a transistor hidden
under my pillow. It bewitches me still. I
papered my childhood room with Beatles
posters; I read everything I could about
them at a young age. I wrote school essays
and did public speaking assignments on them.
By Grade 7, I was signing my artwork
“Deirdre Lennon Kelly.” I also had an alias,
Rita McCartney, that I used when being
truant at my friends’ high school.
As a Globe and Mail staff writer, I got to
write about them again. I interviewed Ringo
for my paper, and reviewed Paul in concert
in Halifax. I later met Paul when I crashed
a New York City party where I knew he’d be
guest of honour. This wasn’t that long ago.
I remain Beatles mad.
Who’s my fave? I
definitely can’t say. I love each for
different reasons.
I have two favourite
fashion periods: 1965 around the time of Help! —
love the length of the hair, the
East-meets-West clothing styles, the
sexiness exuding from the we’re-great-and-we
know-it attitude. They’re smoking a lot of
weed at this time and it’s making them come
loose at the seams.
I also adore their late Beatles look,
1968 on to 1969, when the look isn’t as much
fashion as it is anti-fashion — in other
words, a pure distillation of individual
style.
When you look at photos from
this period you can see so many
iconic Beatles garments melding
together — the pointed-toe boots,
the distressed denim, the androgyny
which the Beatles trail-blazed as a
mainstay of pop culture. It is here
represented by flowing silk scarves,
transparent fabrics and (on Paul)
the colour pink. They are like
chameleons, ever changing their
polka dots to keep us fascinated —
and forever turned on.
− End of article.
Our Top 10 Beatles Stories from 2023 |
Channel Highlights
By Andrew of Parlogram Auctions
We've published over 50 videos in
2023 and this video is a compilation of
edited highlights from 10 of our favourites.
Some you may have seen, others you may have
missed and some might be completely new to
you. But all were made with a passion which
we hope comes through on each and every one
and we really hope you enjoy watching them.
New Interview with Terry Draper of Klaatu
plus Terry's new release "In The Beginning" By Michael Noland
January 1, 2024
Unboxing The Sgt. Pepper's Master Tape -
A Genuine Beatles Holy Grail by Andrew of Parlogram Auctions
KLAATU: The Complete Breakdown! Their
History, Albums & Songs By Michael Noland: The Bottom
Line
This cover
image released by Julien's Auctions shows
"Beats & Threads" by Ringo Starr, an
illustrated journey through the former
Beatles drummer's career, featuring images
of everything from his drum kits to his
trend-setting wardrobe. The 312-page book is
being sold through the publishing division
of Julien's Auctions. (Julien's Auctions via
AP)
NEW YORK (AP) — Ringo Starr's
latest project is for fans of music
and of fashion.
Published Friday, “Beats &
Threads” is an illustrated journey
through the former Beatles drummer's
decades in show business, featuring
images of everything from his drum
kits to his trend-setting wardrobe.
The 312-page book is being sold
through the publishing division of
Julien's Auctions.
"Featuring nearly 300 shimmering
images capturing iconic and many
never-before-seen intimate moments
of Ringo’s illustrious life and
career, along with the drum icon’s
warm memories told in his own words,
this immense tribute to the enduring
influence and time transcending
impact of the Fab Four member is a
ticket to ride through fashion and
Beatles history," the publisher
announced.
“Beats and Threads” has a list
price of $80, along with signed
limited editions for as much as
$750. All proceeds will be donated
to the Lotus Foundation, which
offers support for various
charitable projects, from substance
abuse to homelessness.
Starr, 83, has had a busy 2023,
releasing the EP “Rewind Forward,”
touring with his All-Starr Band and
working with Paul McCartney on the
“final” Beatles song, “Now and
Then.”
The Canadian Press. All rights
reserved.
"The Summer of Love with Marijke of The
Fool" Original Title:
Meet the Trendsetting Mystics that gave The
Beatles their Psychedelic Style
By Isabella Barnett for MessyNessyChic.com
(original publication date: October 13,
2021)
The Fool left its mark all over the
1960s, but few can match the name to the art
today. The Dutch collective of artists and
designers who named themselves after a Tarot
card that’s often numbered as zero in the
deck – as in the first – were unquestionable
pioneers of the psychedelic aesthetic that
defined one of the most memorable and
revolutionary decades of the 20th century.
From their far-out album art, marketing and
set design, to the groovy fashion worn by
the bands that led the British Invasion,
most notably The Beatles, the collective’s
work had a tremendous influence on the
hippie movement as a whole. So let’s take a
trip (pun semi-intended) and discover the
tastemakers behind the look that propelled a
cultural phenomenon….
The Fool. 1968 (From left to right:
Barry Finch, Simon Posthuma, Yosha
Leeger andMarijke
Koger)
The Fool
Fashion designer and artist Marijke
KogerofThe
Foolin
her Amsterdam studio,1965,
by Cor Jaring
Marijke Koger would become the leader
of the collective that included Dutch
artists Yosha Leeger, Simon Posthuma and
Barry Finch as its original members. She was
a high school dropout who opened her first
fashion boutique at the age of 18 in
Amsterdam, where she met her band of future
collaborators. Together, they decided to
pack up and move to the “magic island” of
Ibiza, where intellectuals, artists,
painters and photographers were starting to
establish their residence. It was there that
a photographer for The Times, Karl
Ferris, snapped a photo of Marijke and her
friends, wearing the collective’s eclectic
designs made from colourful batik fabrics.
The photo story was promptly sent off to
print in London and almost overnight, they
became the faces of the burgeoning hippie
movement. London was abuzz with murmurs
about this “exotic” new look that was such a
departure from the geometric Mod fashion
dominating British youth culture at the
time. Seizing the opportunity, the hungry
young designers made their way to London
where they met a high-powered publicist and
quickly became designers in demand.
The Fool in London
The Fool
Marijke was first introduced to tarot
in 1966 by Graham Bond, a rising blues
musician at the time, and was instantly
intrigued by the cards’ ethereal properties
as well as their notable artistic identity.
Originating in Italy in the 1400s, tarot has
associations with the occult dating back to
1780 in France, when mystics first started
to ascribe meaning to the different figures
on the cards. Since the hippie movement was
associated with mind altering psychedelics,
there was a natural draw to esotericism.
Marijke was only interested in the lighter
energy of tarot, and identified most with
the fool card because it represented
cultural and creative activities. From then
on, her collective became known as The Fool.
Marijke Koger modelling her designs
Later, when The Beatles met members of
The Fool for the first time,Marijke
would do a tarot reading for Paul McCartney
when he unexpectedly showed up at their
London apartment with John Lennon. The
band’s manager Brian Epstein had already
been working with the collective and
commissioned their work for his concert
flyers. The Beatles by this time were ready
to shed their Mod style, and when Lennon and
McCartney saw the The Fool’s psychedelic
artwork, they insisted on seeing more.
“During John and Paul’s first visit to
our house in Bayswater,” remembers The
Fool’s Simon Posthuma, “they saw the ‘Wonderwall,’
a composition consisting of a decorated
armoire and a bust, against an arched wall,
painted in the style that was up until then
new to the world. ‘I love it, I want
to live in it,‘ John said … and Paul
agreed. Afterwards, Marijke laid the tarot
cards for Paul. It turned out to be his
inspiration for writing The
Fool on the Hill."
Marijke at work in the Beatles’
Apple Boutique
The Fool was now in business with The
Beatles, who were gearing up to open their
first business enterprise; a concept store
in the heart of swinging London that they
hoped could capture the true essence of the
band and become a cultural keystone. After
designing the band’s wardrobe for the
television broadcasts ofAll
You Need Is Love and the Magical
Mystery Tour, The Fool were given
full creative freedom for the band’s retail
venture, from designing the boutique’s three
story exterior and interior, to the clothing
and accessories on sale.
The Apple Boutique
The Fool with their designs in the
Apple Boutique
It was called “The Apple Boutique” and
opened on Baker Street in 1967, much to the
excitement of the press, who dubbed it a
“psychedelic supermarket”:
The store faced trouble almost from the
start. For one, The Fool’s striking mural
turned out to be just a bit too striking,
and had to be promptly painted over in
white, allegedly due to the increase in
traffic jams brought on by distracted
drivers and complaints from the neighbours.
Only a year later, the
Apple boutique closed down,
having lost a lot of money very
quickly, which was blamed on a
shoplifting problem. Despite the
failure of the shop, it was only
the beginning of the Beatles
venture under their trademarked
“Apple” name. (In 1976, George
Harrison spotted an advert for
Apple Computer while flicking
through a British magazine and
two years later, the first
lawsuit was filed – but more
on that here).
Lennon with Marijke and Simon
The Fool’s working relationship with
The Beatles didn’t cease with the ill-fated
Apple boutique either. Not only did they
continue to collaborate commercially with
the band and its members, but they also
designed private pieces. John Lennon asked
for his piano and guitars to be painted by
their hand, and in addition to his Mini car,
George Harrison’s fireplace was ornamented
with The Fool’s colourful, signature Art
Nouveau inspired motifs.
The Fool painting John Lennon’s
piano
George Harrison with his Mini,
painted by The Fool
George Harrison’s fireplace,
designed by The Fool
Of course, they weren’t the only
designers inspired by Art
Nouveau in the 60s – in fact there
was a large revival of work inspired by the
organic shapes and themes explored at the
turn of the century. The Fool saw these
seductive styles as the key to a new
psychedelic vision.
Wonderwallpromotional
poster
Jane Birkin inWonderwall,
standing in front of the famous
armoire designed by The Fool
In 1968, their popular aesthetic won
them an important gig designing the set for Wonderwall,
starring a young Jane Birkin and scored by
George Harrison. While reviews were mixed at
the time, visually, it’s one of the most
stunning films to come out of the 1960s, and
now considered a cult classic which
perfectly embodies the era.
The Fool, unused artwork for the
Sgt.Pepper Beatles album cover, 1967
The Fool was now busier than ever
creating and defining the look of British
counterculture. The same year that the
collective designed the sleeve graphics for
The Beatles’Sgt. Pepper’s
Lonely Hearts Club Band LP, they worked
with Eric Clapton to decorate his infamous
guitar and the rest of the instruments and
costumes for his band Cream, as well as the
album’s packaging.
Other leading music bands of the 1960s were
lining up to work with them, but in 1968,
The Fool decided to create music of their
own when US Mercury Records offered them a
recording contract. Their psychedelic folk
album, The Fool, was a monumental flop –
although pop culture magazine Dangerous
Minds now calls it “an incredible, but
long-forgotten album”.
The Fool, album cover, 1968
For their final act as a group after
moving to Los Angeles, they created a mural
on the Aquarius Theatre for a production of
the Broadway musical Hair. But
this wasn’t just any mural, it was the
largest mural in the world at the time.
Shortly after, the collective went their
separate ways.
Aquarius theater Los Angeles, mural
by The Fool
Yasha and Barry started a clothing
boutique on Melrose called The Chariot but
returned to Amsterdam soon after. Marijke
and Simon Posthuma, who were married at the
time, stayed in Los Angeles to pursue a
music career as a duo, but also split up
eventually and Simon too, returned to
Amsterdam.
Marijke, photographed by Linda
McCartney
Sadly Simon Posthuma died last year,
but Marijke can still be found living in LA;
painting and designing album artwork and
sharing all of the wild tales from her life on
her blog. Her online musings are a
rare opportunity to hear tales of this
legendary time straight from the source, as
she recalls her adventures from within the
inner sanctum of rock royalty.
−
End of article.
Bonus videos:
"Rainbow Man" by The Fool
Documentary about the Artist Marijke
Koger (artist for The Beatles,
Cream, Procol Harum, Aquarius
Theater and more). It focuses on
1967 - 68 but also on her early
career and subsequent creations.
Beatles-Style Poster With Slain
Russian Activists Removed From Wall
In St. Petersburg
By Radio Free Europe (originally
published on July 15, 2021)
Witnesses said the poster was
removed after hanging in position
for several hours.
ST.
PETERSBURG, Russia -- Police in Russia's
second largest city, St. Petersburg, have
removed a wall-sized poster with portraits
of slain Russian rights defenders,
politicians, and journalists, hours after it
appeared on a wall in a park.
The poster, drawn
as a replica of the 1966 Beatles' Revolver
album cover with portraits of
slain lawyer Stanislav Markelov, journalists
Anna Politkovskaya and Anastasia Baburova,
human rights defender Natalya Estemirova,
and opposition politician Boris Nemtsov
among others, appeared on July 15 on the
wall of a transformer vault in the
Pushkarsky Garden in President Vladimir
Putin's hometown. It came on the 12th
anniversary of Estemirova's murder.
Natalya Estemirova, the head of the
Memorial human rights center's office in
Chechnya, was abducted near her home in the
Chechen capital, Grozny, on July 15, 2009,
and shot dead. Nobody has been convicted of
her killing.
A sentence saying "Heroes of the
days that passed" was written on the right
side of the poster.
Witnesses said the poster was removed
by police officers and a number of men in
civilian clothes after hanging in position
for several hours.
The mural depicted Navalny making
the heart gesture to his wife from a
glass defendants' cage in a Moscow
courtroom in
early February after he
was sentenced and taken away to a
Russian prison.
It only took a few hours before
police in President Vladimir Putin's
hometown arrived and the authorities
ordered that it be
painted over.
In late April, a mural of jailed
Kremlin critic Aleksei Navalny was painted
on the same wall and survived only a matter
of hours before authorities painted over it.
In that mural, Navalny,
Putin's most-vocal critic, was shown smiling
and making the shape of a heart with his
hands with the slogan "A hero of a new time"
next to them.
Local police then launched a probe
into "vandalism motivated by political,
ideological, racial, ethnic, or religious
hatred."
During the 1960s and 1970s, the
Beatles were a symbol of freedom among
Soviet youth.
‘They Can F**k Off’: Russian Rock Icon
Sounds Off On Backers Of Putin’s Ukraine War
By Carl Schreck for Radio Free Europe
(originally published on May 28, 2022)
The lead singer of Mashina Vremeni
(Time Machine), Andrei Makarevich,
has become an open critic of Putin's
expansionism since Russia's invasion
of Ukraine began in
February.
When Vladimir Putin took in a Paul
McCartney concert on Red Square nearly two
decades ago this month, Andrei Makarevichrocked
outnext to the Russian
president as the ex-Beatle performed an
encore of “Back In The U.S.S.R.”
Five years later, Makarevich -- one of
Russia’s best-known rock stars --played
a Red Square concertin
support of Putin and his handpicked
placeholder successor, Dmitry Medvedev, and
said he truly supported the ruling duo.
But since Russia’s seizure and occupation
of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula in 2014,
Makarevich has become an open critic of
Putin’s expansionism. And after the Russian
leader launched an unprovoked invasion of
Ukraine in February, the rock star has a
message for those who embrace Putin’s war
and the Latin letter “Z” that the government
deploys as apatriotic
symbol.
“They can f**k off,” Makarevich, founder
of the legendary Russian rock band Mashina
Vremeni (Time Machine), said in aninterviewwith
Current Time, the Russian-language channel
run by RFE/RL in cooperation with VOA.
Makarevich (second right), rocks out
with Vladimir Putin (third right) at
Paul McCartney's 2003 concert in
Moscow.
Like several otherprominentRussian
entertainers, Makarevich, 68, has decamped
to Israel since Putin ordered the invasion
of Ukraine on February 24. Some of these
celebrities -- such as Makarevich’s fellow
rock star Boris Grebenshchikov and showman
Maksim Galkin -- have been openly critical
of the war, a position now fraught with
legal risks under a snowballing crackdown on
dissent in Russia.
The invasion, Makarevich says, became a
red line for him.
“Before the hostilities started, before
people started dying, I could fully
understand that people can hold different
views of the same thing. But when it
suddenly turned into war, and someone
shouts, ‘Right on!’ -- then I just cross
this person out,” Makarevich said.
‘Much Worse’ Than 1968
Makarevich, who says his musical career
was inspired by The Beatles, founded his
band Time Machine in 1969. And while the
band was admired by many in the underground
Soviet rock scene, it was never deemed
subversive by authorities and even went on
to achieve mainstream status.
In a2008
interviewwith RFE/RL’s
Russian Service, Makarevich defended his
decision to play the Red Square event in
support of Medvedev’s presidency, calling
Putin’s anointed candidate the most
reasonable and acceptable choice.
But three years later, when Putin opted
to return to the presidency, Makarevichexpressed
disillusionment, saying Russians were
“being robbed of what was left of our
electoral rights."
Following Makarevich’scriticismof
Russian aggression against Ukraine in 2014,
Kremlin loyalistsbranded
hima traitor, and his
concerts werecanceled.
Makarevich (center) joins fellow
Russian stars onstage in 1993.
While Russian officials havedenouncedwhat
they call cancel culture targeting Russians
and Russian culture in the West following
the Ukraine invasion, Makarevich told
Current Time that he has not experienced
this personally since leaving Russia.
“I travel around the world a lot now and
am invited to give concerts. I’m traveling
to Cyprus now. Georgia is calling. They
probably wouldn’t be calling if there was
some kind of ‘canceling’ of Russian
culture,” he said.
Makarevich likened Russia’s war against
Ukraine to the Soviet invasion of
Czechoslovakia in 1968 but said the current
war is “much worse.”
“What is happening in Ukraine is much
worse in terms of the scale of misery than
what happened back then in Prague,” he said.
‘Criminal Orders’
Amid mountingevidenceofwar
crimescommitted by Russian
forces in Ukraine, Makarevich said he
couldn’t speak on behalf of Russian soldiers
but said that they should not carry out
criminal orders.
“That is on their conscience. That is
their decision,” he said.
Russia has denied targeting civilian
areas in a war it insists on calling a
special operation, though reporters --
including RFE/RL correspondents on the
ground -- have documented numerous cases of
such attacks. Moscow has also spread
demonstrably false conspiracy theories
claiming incidents involving potential war
crimes were staged by Ukraine.
Asked whether he envisions any scenario
in which he would not return to Russia,
Makarevich said: “I don’t even think about
that.”
“I am waiting for events to unfold that
I, unfortunately, cannot influence,” he
said.
Makarevich added that he continues to
follow the news about the war.
“I feel the same as I did on day one [of
the war]: It’s disgusting,” he said. “That’s
all I can say.”
Written by RFE/RL’s Carl Schreck based on
reporting by Andrei Tsyganov of Current Time